Skip to Content
Menu
Poet Sagawa Chika Late Gathering
Close
Prose
While Passing Between the Trees
Wearing glasses was not for the purpose of seeing things more clearly. Which is to say, if I limit what I see to the width of my face, having been deceived only by that which is visible, it is often the case that I am led astray by the sparks of the phenomenon itself, before I am able to understand just what kind of spread or permeation is to come. Seeing is not equivalent to knowing the result; the point is to arrive at the end of one part of the phenomenon. I contemplate these things as I walk through the wheat field. The wheat grows vigorously like a victor, shining in white rows against the black earth. I wonder if the sun in May isn’t a little too bright for the Japanese poets of today. They speak only of dreams and illusions, failing to harmonize with this all-too-French air. What relationship could there be between their imagery and the row of trees on the other side? The error of having only introduced the world of Leica into poetry might simply make us dizzy; neither the sweetness of pastry, nor a string of words, could be said to have the freshness of the new zelkova leaves on the trees on the side of the path I walk. They lose themselves in the moment of imitating others, and feel tired after chipping away at that mass. There is a clear beauty in the hazy scenery when I have removed my glasses, and there is also a hazy goodness in what I see clearly when my glasses are on—but it is foolish to believe that everyone must gaze into a single mirror and distinguish black from white. It is not so much about searching for boundaries, but rather the precise snapping together of infinite allusions on either side of that single line, to the cross-sections of a leap in the field of vision. And whether that field of vision is near or far determines the highs and lows of artistic rhythm. I believe poetry is the study of language. Unlike spoken language, it is a language of the heart, not visible from the surface. Words are selected out of deep contemplation and fill the air. It is not a collection of words for the sake of speech, but an attempt to say something, or to reflect something. Very sparse and most strict, it is a skillfulness precisely on the brink of burning out like a flame. It can mean to say one single real thing within a long conversation, or to go chasing after it from behind.
I step on a still-lit cigarette stub. Someone has already gone ahead of me. His failure, and her error, was in the search for something man-made in the discontinuities of this endless nature. As I walk into the woods, I become aware of the roaring wind. I find it hard to believe that Kashiwagi Shunzō, many of whose poems sounded just like this wind, was in love with treetops, as well as inorganic substances like the air and the wind. Rather, I imagine it was quite the opposite. He must have written those useless things out of a desire to portray people in the moment the wind passes through their bodies, or to describe the sight of himself gazing at the ponies whinnying in the woods. Am I the only one who senses suffering in the poetry of this man who longed to portray the human, stripped bare, but simply could not depict a person shouting as much, and so instead portrayed the echoes, and the footprints, left by those who had gone ahead? This intensity is best felt in his poem called “Lightning” in the April issue of Shii no ki, rather than the one called “Early Spring” in the May issue. Kashiwagi-san understands the language of trees, and is quite infuriated—he emerges before us by breaking through the scenery. “Life in the Countryside” by Ema Shoko provides the usual inexplicable pleasure that is like listening to music that is out of focus. No matter what the situation, she never tries to put things in focus. We feel a bit lost. And then just at that moment, she makes a vividly beautiful curve. I always expect great things from Hirano Jinkei, and he has never disappointed. “Dissociation” is a deftly constructed poem. In “A moment with an old friend,” Uchida Tadashi depicts the fragility of emotions toppled like dominos as a result of kind words. No real object is visible, but its projection casts blurry rings at our hearts. These are the things I feel from the poems of Uchiyama Yoshio. In both “Daily Life” and “Contemplation” in the March issue, he seems to express an interior symmetry using only straight lines. “Roof Mechanic” by Abe Tamotsu is a sweet lyric poem. It makes us imagine a picture of a girl with a flower bouquet. We feel it might be a bit distant in terms of music; the thorns on the roses shine like clear crystalline needles. “Song of March” by Takamatsu Akira seems rather gentle. But the seasonal winds are no longer pastoral. Like those footsteps, they slap our faces as they pass us by. Walking through the woods, I discover a single tree with very smooth bark. It is unfamiliar to me and I wonder what it is. I read Odakane Jirō’s work for the first time. “Song of Stone” is like looking at the jagged breaks in refracted light. Something akin to viscosity indicates a faint brightness.
The trees stand silent. As if to conquer time, for the sake of a thousand years. Purity was not the difference between water and beer. I find it suffocating to be unable to see the sky from between the trees.

 眼鏡をかけてゐるといふことは物をはつきり見るためではなかつた。つまり顔の幅だけで物を見てゐると、現はれてゐる事柄だけに錯覚を感じそのものがどんな拡がりをもつてゐるのか、どんなふうに浸潤してゆくかを知る前に現象それ自身の火花にごまかされてしまふ場合が多い。見ることは結果を知るのではなく、現象の中の一部分の終りに達するためである。こんなことを考へながら麦畑の中を歩いて行く。戦ひとつたやうに生々と伸びてゐる麦が黒い土地をくまどつて白く輝いてゐる。五月の太陽は今の日本の詩人たちにとつては少し明るすぎるのではないだらうか。それは幻影と夢を語るのみで、このあまりにフランス流の空気の中では調和する何物もない。向ふ側の樹木のつながりと彼らのイメエヂとどんな関係があるといふのか。ライカの世界だけを時に移入されたといふ過失は、眩暈を感じる程度で、菓子のやうな甘さも、羅列された言葉も、私が歩いてゐる道の側の欅の若葉ほどの新鮮さがあるとはいへない。他人の真似をしてゐる間だけ自己を失ひ、そのかたまりをなしくづしてしまつた時は疲労してゐる。眼鏡をはづした時のぼんやりした風景の中にも明瞭な美しさがあり、眼鏡をかけてゐる時ははつきり見えるものの中にも、ぼんやりしたよさがあるのに、誰もが、たつた一つの鏡を覗いて、黒白をきめなければならないと考へることは愚かだ。境界線を探すことではなく、その一本の線の両側の無数の伏線を、飛躍した視野の切断面にぴしりぴしりと、あはせてゆくことにあるのではないだらうか。ただ、その視野が近いか遠いかといふことに芸術的なリズムの高い低いがきめられると思ふ。詩は言葉の勉強だと思ふ。併しそれは話すやうな言葉とちがつて、表面から見えない心の言葉である。思惟の中から選ばれた言葉で空間を充すことであると思ふ。言ふために言はれた言葉だけの意味を拾ひあげることではなく、何を言はうとし、又何物かを反映しようとすることであらう。最もきびしくそして非常にわづかで、焔のやうに焼切るところの巧さである。沢山のおしやべりをしながら何か一つほんとうのことを言ふことでもあり、或は背後から追ひかけてゆくことでもある。
 火の消えない煙草の吸ひ殻を私は踏みつける。私の先を誰れかもう歩いて行つたのだ。このたえまない自然の断続の中から、人為的なものをみつけることに彼の失敗があり、彼女の誤謬があつた。林の中に入ると今まで聞えなかつた風の音がやかましくきこえる。あの風の音のやうな作品を沢山かいた柏木俊三さんは梢と、それから空気や風のやうな無機物を愛したとは考へられない。むしろ反対のものであつたらう。風が体内を通り抜けてゆく時の人間や、林の中で小馬の啼声に目をむいてゐる自分自身の姿を書きたいために、ああした無駄なことをかいたのにちがひない。裸になつた人間をかきたいのに、どうしてもそれを叫んだ人間をかけないで木魂ばかりを書き、通つて行つてしまつた足跡だけをかいてゐた柏木さんの詩に苦しさといふやうなものが感じられるのは私だけだらうか。椎の木五月号の<早春>といふ詩よりは四月号の<稲妻>にそのはげしさを知ることが出来る。樹木の言葉を知り、そしていきどほつてゐる柏木さんが風物を衝いて出て来るのである。江間章子さんの<田舎ぐらし>はいつものやうに、焦点のない音楽を聴くやうにわけのわからない楽しさを与へる。江間さんはどの場合でもピントをあはせようとしない。私たちはちよつと戸惑する。そのすきに、鮮やかにも美しいカーヴをする。平野仁啓さんにはいつも期待する。そしてそれを裏切られたことはない。<乖離>も手際よくまとめられた作品。<旧友との一時>で内田忠さんは暖い言葉で将棋倒しにくづれてゆく感情の細かさを歌つてゐる。実体はいつも見えない。その投影が私たちの胸にぼんやりした輪をなげる。さうしたものを内山義郎さんの詩から受ける。<生活>にも、三月号の<思索>にも内面の均整を直線だけで表現してゐるやうだ。<屋根屋の職人>の阿部保さんの詩は甘美な抒情詩、私たちは花束をもつた少女の絵をいつも想像し、音楽にしてはあまり遠すぎるかと思ひ、その薔薇の刺は透明な水晶の針のやうに光つてゐる。高松章さんの<三月の歌>は少し緩やかなやうである。併し季節の風はもう牧歌ではない。その足音のやうに私たちの頬を平手で打つて通りすぎる。林の中を歩いてゐると、樹皮のすべすべした木を一本発見する。あまり見馴れぬので何だらうと思ふ。小高根二郎さんの詩を私ははじめて拝見する。<石の歌>は屈折する光のぎざぎざした切り目を見るやうである。粘着力といふやうなものが仄かな明るさを示めす。
 樹木はだまつて立つてゐる。千年の年月のために、時間を克服するかのやうに。純粋といふことは水とビールのちがひではなかつた。私は樹の間から空の見えないのを息苦しいと思つた。

Back to top